Well at least we got that sweet consolation prize in MacIntyre.Between Dotson, Rodriguez and Ballage, that's three guys we really would have liked to have. Didn't get one.
Well at least we got that sweet consolation prize in MacIntyre.Between Dotson, Rodriguez and Ballage, that's three guys we really would have liked to have. Didn't get one.
Well at least we got that sweet consolation prize in MacIntyre.
You believe that we won three more games because of an upgrade in talent?Exactly. The best way to win recruiting battles is to win games. Coach took a 1 win team and turned it into a 4 win team by finding some diamonds in the rough. Now, this time around, he has gotten in early on some talented kids as well as winning a few recruiting battles and has brought in a very nice influx of talent. He is clearly a talented coach, and if we continue to up the talent with each recruiting class, we will start to see this program rise again. This might not be a year where we see a lot of improvement in the win/loss column, but we aren't getting worse. Give Coach MM time to do his thing, results will come. I know some people like to see immediate results, but given where this program was at, we will have to be a little patient. Good things are coming though, I have no doubt.
No. Try reading it again. I believe we won three more games because we had a competent coach, who also happened to find a couple of diamond in the rough type players. I'm saying that this recruiting class is an upgrade in talent, due in part to the fact that we won three more games.You believe that we won three more games because of an upgrade in talent?
Imagine the upgrade in talent if we were an FCS team that gets to play an FCS schedule.No. Try reading it again. I believe we won three more games because we had a competent coach, who also happened to find a couple of diamond in the rough type players. I'm saying that this recruiting class is an upgrade in talent, due in part to the fact that we won three more games.
Not sure what the intent of saying that is. If you are trying to be a prick (which seems to be your MO), then that was a pretty weak attempt. If not, then the post seems to be pointlessly obvious.Imagine the upgrade in talent if we were an FCS team that gets to play an FCS schedule.
Which one?
Semper Gumby
Not sure what the intent of saying that is. If you are trying to be a prick (which seems to be your MO), then that was a pretty weak attempt. If not, then the post seems to be pointlessly obvious.
Imagine the upgrade in talent if we were an FCS team that gets to play an FCS schedule.
My bitch is back. Anybody need a sammich?The guy seems to be only capable of bitching about recruiting. The only thoughts his brain can handle.
If it makes anyone feel better UCLA was #2 and we may not have even been ahead of Washington either. The last minute waffling was between ASU and UCLA, he didn't even mention us in a post-commitment interview I saw. Point is its not like we "barley" missed out on getting him.
Yes, that is going to make everyone feel better. I'm going to take your "barley" and make some beer.If it makes anyone feel better UCLA was #2 and we may not have even been ahead of Washington either. The last minute waffling was between ASU and UCLA, he didn't even mention us in a post-commitment interview I saw. Point is its not like we "barley" missed out on getting him.
Calling TG a douche is uncalled for, and an insult to douches everywhere.So I guess he will transfer to fUCLA when he realizes what a douche he is playing for
Yes, that is going to make everyone feel better. I'm going to take your "barley" and make some beer.
No. Try reading it again. I believe we won three more games because we had a competent coach, who also happened to find a couple of diamond in the rough type players. I'm saying that this recruiting class is an upgrade in talent, due in part to the fact that we won three more games.
You have exaggerated competent coaching when comparing 2012 to 2013. The flood and the return of PRich had little to do with Coaching.
It's entirely possible Paul Richardson would have helped beat CSU for Embree in 2012 had he not been injured.
A conservative assessment is that MacIntyre lessened the severity of the beat downs and allowed us to beat Central Arkansas. (Vs loss to Sac State)
The flood allowed CU to get another FCS on the calendar. Fresno was hot and probably beats CU. That victory is on George.
Yes, MacIntyre is a smart coach and is working hard. But he is in a monster sized hole with rock bottom in the rear view mirror.
Let's see how MacIntyre does in 2014 before tying victories to competency.
Don't worry. Everyone will turn on HCMM if there aren't clear signs of improvement next year. As for Ballage, I'm not looking forward to seeing him play for ASU.You have exaggerated competent coaching when comparing 2012 to 2013. The flood and the return of PRich had little to do with Coaching.
It's entirely possible Paul Richardson would have helped beat CSU for Embree in 2012 had he not been injured.
A conservative assessment is that MacIntyre lessened the severity of the beat downs and allowed us to beat Central Arkansas. (Vs loss to Sac State)
The flood allowed CU to get another FCS on the calendar. Fresno was hot and probably beats CU. That victory is on George.
Yes, MacIntyre is a smart coach and is working hard. But he is in a monster sized hole with rock bottom in the rear view mirror.
Let's see how MacIntyre does in 2014 before tying victories to competency.
You have exaggerated competent coaching when comparing 2012 to 2013. The flood and the return of PRich had little to do with Coaching.
It's entirely possible Paul Richardson would have helped beat CSU for Embree in 2012 had he not been injured.
A conservative assessment is that MacIntyre lessened the severity of the beat downs and allowed us to beat Central Arkansas. (Vs loss to Sac State)
The flood allowed CU to get another FCS on the calendar. Fresno was hot and probably beats CU. That victory is on George.
Yes, MacIntyre is a smart coach and is working hard. But he is in a monster sized hole with rock bottom in the rear view mirror.
Let's see how MacIntyre does in 2014 before tying victories to competency.
Don't worry. Everyone will turn on HCMM if there aren't clear signs of improvement next year. As for Ballage, I'm not looking forward to seeing him play for ASU.
You have exaggerated competent coaching when comparing 2012 to 2013. The flood and the return of PRich had little to do with Coaching.
It's entirely possible Paul Richardson would have helped beat CSU for Embree in 2012 had he not been injured.
A conservative assessment is that MacIntyre lessened the severity of the beat downs and allowed us to beat Central Arkansas. (Vs loss to Sac State)
The flood allowed CU to get another FCS on the calendar. Fresno was hot and probably beats CU. That victory is on George.
Yes, MacIntyre is a smart coach and is working hard. But he is in a monster sized hole with rock bottom in the rear view mirror.
Let's see how MacIntyre does in 2014 before tying victories to competency.
Why did you leave out the CSU game and the stomping of Cal?
I'll give you the flood. That's one game. So if you want to take that away, fine, I still stand by the fact that HCMM is competent (I might add that competency is not black and white, as you are making it seem).
Obviously P-Rich helped this team, but did he help as much as losing Ray Polk and David Bakhtiari hurt us? You might say yes, but it's debateable.
I do agree with it, by the wayVery fair post by Skidmark IMO.
Counting victories was what appeared to be your measure of competency, not mine.
Beating CSU should be expected, and not some measurement of competency.
The Cal victory in 2013 and WSU victory in 2012 are a wash. Both Embree and Mac were 1-8 in conference. How they won was different, but in the record book, a win is a win.
I completely agree that competency isn't black and white, nor should it be measured by MacIntyre's 4 wins. That was exactly my point.
But let's not judge MacIntyre's competency using Embree's QB sneak on 1st down as some sort of measuring stick.
Not sure why you would even want to debate how losing Polk and Bak is comparable to losing the best WR to come through CU in a generation. A better measure of MacIntyre's competency is to see how productive CU's offense will be without PRich.
Counting victories was what appeared to be your measure of competency, not mine.
Beating CSU should be expected, and not some measurement of competency.
The Cal victory in 2013 and WSU victory in 2012 are a wash. Both Embree and Mac were 1-8 in conference. How they won was different, but in the record book, a win is a win.
I completely agree that competency isn't black and white, nor should it be measured by MacIntyre's 4 wins. That was exactly my point.
But let's not judge MacIntyre's competency using Embree's QB sneak on 1st down as some sort of measuring stick.
Not sure why you would even want to debate how losing Polk and Bak is comparable to losing the best WR to come through CU in a generation. A better measure of MacIntyre's competency is to see how productive CU's offense will be without PRich.
Fair enough. I agree with your main point then. I don't think that wins and losses are the only measuring stick for a coaching staff. But, if that is your argument, then you missed my point. I didn't say that I think the coaching staff is competent because they won 3 more games. I said the team won 3 more games because the coaching staff was competent. I hope you see the difference.
. MacIntyre year three is when things get real.