somebody
Well-Known Member
CU too
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
2015 Coaching Carousel
- Thread starter leftybuff
- Start date
CU too
The OSU coaching search should be in a textbook somewhere on how to conduct one of these things. A one-week coaching search that poaches an established head coach from a P5 school that just played for it's conference championship. Amazing. I would have given CU a better chance of getting Les Miles.
Jeff Tedford's the likely next coach of the CFL's B.C. Lions.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/football/cfl/lions-leaning-toward-hiring-tedford-as-head-coach/
http://www.sportsnet.ca/football/cfl/lions-leaning-toward-hiring-tedford-as-head-coach/
thats a good move for Wiscy if they can close it
Meh. Chryst hasn't exactly lit the world on fire at Pitt
AlferdJasper
Well-Known Member
SIAP , but here are the SEC Salaries just for yucks, er thoughtful comparison.
Posted Dec. 11:
SEC coaching salaries (average amount earned per year on current contract)
*McElwain was serving as head coach at Colorado State when USA Today released its list last month. His updated salary is the figure offered by Florida.
Posted Dec. 11:
SEC coaching salaries (average amount earned per year on current contract)
- Nick Saban, Alabama — $7.1 million
- Kevin Sumlin, Texas A&M — $5 million
- Les Miles, LSU — $4.3 million
- Hugh Freeze, Ole Miss — $4 million
- Steve Spurrier, South Carolina — $4 million
- Gus Malzahn, Auburn — $3.8 million
- Butch Jones, Tennessee — $3.6 million
- Mark Stoops, Kentucky — $3.6 million
- Jim McElwain, Florida — $3.5 million*
- Gary Pinkel, Mizzou — $3.4 million
- Mark Richt, Georgia — $3.3 million
- Bret Bielema, Arkansas — $3.2 million
- Dan Mullen, Mississippi St. — $3 million
- Derek Mason, Vanderbilt — Private
*McElwain was serving as head coach at Colorado State when USA Today released its list last month. His updated salary is the figure offered by Florida.
Something is bound to happen with Miles pretty soon (maybe not this year, but soon):
2011: 1st is his division - and then got skunked by Alabama 21-0 for the MNC
2012: 2nd
2013: 3rd
2014: tied for 4th
2011: 1st is his division - and then got skunked by Alabama 21-0 for the MNC
2012: 2nd
2013: 3rd
2014: tied for 4th
I think it's tough for the blueblood programs to meet their own expectations. Texas didn't feel like they hit it out of the park last year either with Strong. Michigan will probably be a little disappointed with whoever they hire if it's not a Harbaugh or Les Miles.
Part of the problem is perception.
As more involved colllege football fans we know who Anderson is but to a typical fan base he is two years removed from the MWC and didn't win any titles at Wisconsin.
Sark hasn't won anything either but he has "been around" for a long time and came from Washington.
I know it doesn't have to make sense but perception is important.
Lots of fans in Florida weren't happy with Sparkles, and to them his most important resume line is his time as OC at Bama.
This is why every time a major job comes open you start hearing NFL names, guys who are currently in the TV booth, etc.
LSU fans expectations are out of control would be the first reason.
Good points, may be time for LM to try to get to Ann Arbor. The Corndogs are hard to please.
If the powers that be stay out of Strong's way, let him do his job his way, Texas will be nasty in time. It's no secret the guy is a damn good coach. That Louisville D this year was his doing. Question is, will they put their ego aside and let the man work?
They do have some legitimate gripes with Miles. How Cam Cameron the OC is getting 1.3 million this year for that offense is thievery. And it's always the offense that's been the liability, and people just can't understand why Miles continues to meddle with it and continue to underachieve with the talent he recruits. It's just really frustrating to watch sometimes.
No.
When has Texas ever put egos aside? Won't happen.
I think Strong is a good coach but he may never get a real chance to succeed.
Mack Brown was not a great coach (he was a great recruiter back when he tried hard) who would have never had a NC if not for getting VY. What Mack was very good at was feeding the egos of the administrators and more importantly the money people behind the program.
Will Strong ever be able to build the kind of relationship with those people that gives him enough pull to make his own decisions while they still feel important?
Texas is a unique type of job. Some other schools are similar but none are as political as Texas.
fatbuff
Member
With the freshmen that Miles had on the team this year I only expect them to get better for the next few years. The biggest obstacle is keeping those guys out of the NFL.
http://southcarolina.247sports.com/Bolt/Spurriers-2-3-more-years-comment-is-backfiring-33803214
South Carolina recruits are being poached due to Spurrier's '2-3 more years' comment.
South Carolina recruits are being poached due to Spurrier's '2-3 more years' comment.
I was wondering if that would bite him in the ass. Usually older coaches are careful to always say "5 more years" -- if they say anything.
Watch them get a succession plan in place, and those always go smoothly.
College football "destination jobs"
put this here instead of a new thread.
Let's leave alone the point that the author does NOT consider CU to be a "destination job" -- I think that ground is currently being covered in a few other threads. Feel free to pick on the author's Big Ten bias. Here's his list of what he considers the 25 'destination jobs' in college football:
I do appreciate him clarifying that it's Miami of Florida that's in the ACC. Probably necessary, those mid-westerner's don't get out much. :lol: (seriously, those guys are still trying to figure out why tOSU isn't playing in the Rose Bowl against Oregon).
Using the author's criteria for 'destination job':
"high level" is subjective, but "compete for and win championships" not so much.
contentious points (maybe don't belong): Miami, Washington. Apparently Alvarez isn't sure Wisconsin belongs. By the author's own criteria, ND should be out b/c they aren't in a situation to win conference championships and haven't been part of the (more) M(than ever )NC discussion in years. I debated about VT, but objectively do believe that the coaching the Hokies should be considered a destination job.
contentious points (maybe do belong): Air Force, Stanford, Mississippi, Mississippi State, Missouri (yeah, on this subject, I think SEC bias is appropriate).
somebody tell me why you disagree and I'll post my rebuttal tonight after I get sh**-faced.
put this here instead of a new thread.
Let's leave alone the point that the author does NOT consider CU to be a "destination job" -- I think that ground is currently being covered in a few other threads. Feel free to pick on the author's Big Ten bias. Here's his list of what he considers the 25 'destination jobs' in college football:
I do appreciate him clarifying that it's Miami of Florida that's in the ACC. Probably necessary, those mid-westerner's don't get out much. :lol: (seriously, those guys are still trying to figure out why tOSU isn't playing in the Rose Bowl against Oregon).
Using the author's criteria for 'destination job':
Seems to me that you have to add a criteria for "coaches tend to stay there a while".
"high level" is subjective, but "compete for and win championships" not so much.
contentious points (maybe don't belong): Miami, Washington. Apparently Alvarez isn't sure Wisconsin belongs. By the author's own criteria, ND should be out b/c they aren't in a situation to win conference championships and haven't been part of the (more) M(than ever )NC discussion in years. I debated about VT, but objectively do believe that the coaching the Hokies should be considered a destination job.
contentious points (maybe do belong): Air Force, Stanford, Mississippi, Mississippi State, Missouri (yeah, on this subject, I think SEC bias is appropriate).
somebody tell me why you disagree and I'll post my rebuttal tonight after I get sh**-faced.
No one can honestly argue it is a destination job IMO.