What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Colorado v UCLA - October 28, 2023 - 5.30pm MT, ABC

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I was a frosh (85), the team was back in black, but the cheer squad and band still wore the blue. Anyone remember the long haired cheer guy that used to a backflip off the back of the Ralphie trailer?
 
You can tell the bloom is off the season when we area busy talking about blue uniforms instead of anything else.
 
Polumbus was the on the radio saying he sees two more wins on the schedule, but kinda weaseled out of saying which two, though he kinda mentioned that the only one he thought we had no chance on was OSU.

I don't know that we can't beat UCLA. The question is why you think we collapsed against Stanford, and what was the real Buffs team that night. I'm going to be a sunshine pumper and think that the first half team was closer to the real Buffs, and I'm going to say why. It is hard to come out of the half where you're up big, have a couple things go against you, and somehow find the energy and the resilience to try to take back that momentum. You go from having fun and feeling like you can't do anything wrong to just having lead in your legs, you just want the game to be over, you keep looking at the clock just hoping that it will run out with you still ahead. That's the kind of adversity that I would imagine not a lot of these kids had ever experienced before. As I said last weekend, I think the time and the fact that the stadium went from completely full to half empty at the half didn't help.

What Prime and the coaching staff are doing over the bye, hopefully, is scouting themselves - not just the players, but the coaches too - and coming up with ways to put themselves in better positions. I think UCLA is beatable. Moore is, to put it mildly, not good. Their run game is great, but this is a game we should be able to run man on and push the safeties up. Of course, I would have said that against Stanford too, so wtf do I know. Offensively, we know where we're good and where we suck, but Shedeur is still Shedeur, and I really don't think there's a game we are out of as long as he's the QB.

Anyway, flame on. I'll have what Liver's having.
 
Need to start getting turnovers in bunches again if we want to go bowling.

CSC drives me nuts because he seems to get burned at least twice a game, but he is one of those dudes who somehow can get picks. He's been quiet for the last two games, so maybe he's due again. Travis is definitely due for a big game at CB.
 
My first CU season 1980.... worse yet was my best friend from high school was a scholarship QB for Drake. He still reminds me of it to this day.
My first issue from my first subscription to sports illustrated was the one with Douglas Looney’s article on the dysfunction of the football team and the AD in 1980. Quite the eye opener for a little kid to read about spending $40,000 on an office and $1500 on helmet decals we would never use, and getting destroyed 82-42 by OU.
 
out with ye, satan
Toronto International Film Festival GIF by TIFF
 
i have been to several games at the rose bowl including a big CU WIN awhile back.

the stadium is huge and the acoustics are not favorable for the home team. it is hard to get it really loud and the seats are not right on top of the field like folsom. original capacity was over 100k and they never ever filled it up so they reduced it to a max of like 90k. usc does the same type of thing for their home games too but i have seen far far more people at usc than any rose bowl game. then, on top of that, they both tarp over whole sections and cap the number of seats so they can call it a sellout but they do open up more seats when demand is high.

the whole thing is kinda dumb.

the rose bowl is old and hugely inconvenient to get to from anywhere that isn't pasadena. it is hot and smoggy that far inland and entrance and exit to the game is a nightmare. i have tailgated with die hard ucla people and their method is that they go super early in the morning, set up tents and misters and stuff and then they do not break down their setup until hours after the game. they loved all those extra hours with me celebrating a CU win and making fun of the bruins.

the actual rose bowl game is fun. but ucla games at the rose bowl are pretty mediocre. not having a stadium anywhere even close to their campus sucks for them.

i am not going--- i would much rather fly to folsom and all that entails than try to make my way to pasadena.

the coliseum is so much better-- yeah it is an old **** hole too but the students can walk there and it does get loud. and it is less smoggy slightly than pasadena.

i hate visiting pasadena and cannot imagine having to live there but everyone is different.

you should all go and experience it at least once. just try to get hammered enough that you can pass out after the game and wait for the evil traffic to subside.
I will never go back to Pasadena unless it is for a playoff game.
 
“The color was technically “sky blue,” and it was supposed to represent “Colorado’s sky at 9,000 feet,” according to a history of football uniforms compiled by the CU Athletic Department. The change from black to blue was proposed by then-Regent Jack Anderson and approved by the Board of Regents in May 1981.”

I was a student at the time, and we were told it was fairbank's daughter's favorite color. Of course, the AD would never admit they agreed on that basis.
 
Show the rest of it, where it was called back for the blind side block (probably)
So I gotta admit, I don't really understand how they're applying the "blind side block" rule.

I totally get not ear holing someone. I also get not laying a hit on a guy that's just standing there watching.

But if you put your shoulder square into another player's chest when they're running forward, how is that "blind siding them?" It seems to me that there should be a little bit of a duty to look where you're going.

Not only do I have hit them in the right place, I have to make sure they're looking where they're running?
 
So I gotta admit, I don't really understand how they're applying the "blind side block" rule.

I totally get not ear holing someone. I also get not laying a hit on a guy that's just standing there watching.

But if you put your shoulder square into another player's chest when they're running forward, how is that "blind siding them?" It seems to me that there should be a little bit of a duty to look where you're going.

Not only do I have hit them in the right place, I have to make sure they're looking where they're running?
Yeah, I don’t really like it. Plus it makes for some of the coolest looking hits.
“gotta keep your head on swivel when you find yourself in a cockfight!”
 
The lockers in the men's locker-room and some of the decor in/around the comp pool in the Rec Center were still Fairbanks blue until the big remodel (that moved the ice rink, hoops courts and inaugurated the Ralphie outdoor pool)....only maybe 10 years ago.

Kind of icky, the blue.
 
Last edited:
Polumbus was the on the radio saying he sees two more wins on the schedule, but kinda weaseled out of saying which two, though he kinda mentioned that the only one he thought we had no chance on was OSU.

I don't know that we can't beat UCLA. The question is why you think we collapsed against Stanford, and what was the real Buffs team that night. I'm going to be a sunshine pumper and think that the first half team was closer to the real Buffs, and I'm going to say why. It is hard to come out of the half where you're up big, have a couple things go against you, and somehow find the energy and the resilience to try to take back that momentum. You go from having fun and feeling like you can't do anything wrong to just having lead in your legs, you just want the game to be over, you keep looking at the clock just hoping that it will run out with you still ahead. That's the kind of adversity that I would imagine not a lot of these kids had ever experienced before. As I said last weekend, I think the time and the fact that the stadium went from completely full to half empty at the half didn't help.

What Prime and the coaching staff are doing over the bye, hopefully, is scouting themselves - not just the players, but the coaches too - and coming up with ways to put themselves in better positions. I think UCLA is beatable. Moore is, to put it mildly, not good. Their run game is great, but this is a game we should be able to run man on and push the safeties up. Of course, I would have said that against Stanford too, so wtf do I know. Offensively, we know where we're good and where we suck, but Shedeur is still Shedeur, and I really don't think there's a game we are out of as long as he's the QB.

Anyway, flame on. I'll have what Liver's having.
They moved back to Garbers. Moore while a playmaker just couldn't handle the defensive scheme yet. Most true freshman QBs can't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top