What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU MBB Rankings/NET/KenPom/Bracketology Catch-All

The only thing that I'm going to add to this thread before forgetting about it is that our NET suggested that we should have been a 6 seed. We played like we should have been a 6 seed. A 6 is still "supposed" to get eliminated in the round of 32, so take that FWIW, but we countered the disrespect with a strong showing that left most observers impressed. The only sad thing is that we probably have to completely rebuild, instead of being to use this year as a launching pad.
The only 3 seed that would have been as challenging as Marquette is Illinois. And I think it's definitely fair to say that any matchup we'd have gotten as a 6-seed would not have been as tough as 10-seed Boise State (NET 26) and 7-seed Florida (NET 29).

But anyone can bitch about seeding. Buffs had a very good path in this tournament and you're going to have to beat good teams that are playing well in the Dance no matter what.
 
Guess we should remember to look at SoS #'s before getting excited about a high NET ranking.
 
Back
Top