What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

RPI Watch: 2018 Season

So what is worse for the rpi? Utah just pulled a bizarro Colorado with the road sweep followed by the home stand losses against the same four teams.
 
So what is worse for the rpi? Utah just pulled a bizarro Colorado with the road sweep followed by the home stand losses against the same four teams.
Not sure yet. I think we want UA, ASU, USC and UCLA to win enough to be pretty certain bids for the tourney. And then we want CU to be right there above the other 7 teams.
 
On the positive side for the resume:

South Dakota State is balling and is at #63 (surprising Column 2 home win).
Northern Colorado continues to play well and is at #108.
Drake made a big jump to #134.
San Diego is now #91 and looks solid.

Hurting the resume:

Iowa hasn't won in the B1G and is down to #167.
Mercer's only at #201 (we need them at least Top 200 to be a Column 3 win).
New Mexico and CSU aren't doing much and are at #214 & #165, respectively. We need UNM Top 160 and CSU Top 135.
 
On the positive side for the resume:

South Dakota State is balling and is at #63 (surprising Column 2 home win).
Northern Colorado continues to play well and is at #108.
Drake made a big jump to #134.
San Diego is now #91 and looks solid.

Hurting the resume:

Iowa hasn't won in the B1G and is down to #167.
Mercer's only at #201 (we need them at least Top 200 to be a Column 3 win).
New Mexico and CSU aren't doing much and are at #214 & #165, respectively. We need UNM Top 160 and CSU Top 135.
USD is a really solid team. They're gonna make some noise in the WCC. Iowa isn't great, but they've also played a surprisingly hard conference schedule
 
It's not RPI so it doesn't count, but it's interesting to note that CU is 3-1 in "Tier A" games on KenPom (top 50 opponent adjusting for location of game) and 0-2 against "Tier B" (Oregon St and Iowa - top 100 opponent adjusting for location). Only two of our losses are outside of the top 100 adjustments (CSU and San Diego)
 
National media taking notice.

Hell, I don't know if this team can play its way onto the bubble or not. But dammit this is the ride I was hoping for this year with this young group with so many new faces. This season is fun!

 
National media taking notice.

Hell, I don't know if this team can play its way onto the bubble or not. But dammit this is the ride I was hoping for this year with this young group with so many new faces. This season is fun!



We deserve this team as a fanbase after this football season. They're a blast. If we can hold serve at home and sweep the Washington schools on the road (beating UW in Seattle would be just as quality a win as tonight was), we've got a hell of a case for the NCAA tournament.
 
would not be surprised if this year ended up a lot like 2011. A solid resume, perhaps even a really good resume, and CU just barely misses the tourney.
 
Clearly still an outside shot at the tourney. A critical intermediate goal is finishing in the top 4 so they don't have to win 4 during the PAC12 tourney again.

But this is a fun team to watch, regardless
 
would not be surprised if this year ended up a lot like 2011. A solid resume, perhaps even a really good resume, and CU just barely misses the tourney.

One thing with this year compared to that one-There are going to be more bids available to the power 5. In terms of mid major leagues, isn't the West Coast the only one that will get more than just their champion in? I don't see the MWC getting more than one team, and the MVC and A-10 are likely one bid leagues.
 
One thing with this year compared to that one-There are going to be more bids available to the power 5. In terms of mid major leagues, isn't the West Coast the only one that will get more than just their champion in? I don't see the MWC getting more than one team, and the MVC and A-10 are likely one bid leagues.
In college basketball, its the "Power 6". Big East is elite and commands as may bids as anyone.

Beyond the P6, I think the WCC should get 2 or 3 this year, AAC should get 2 or 3, MWC has a chance at 2, and the A-10 could get to 2 even though this is about as down as I can remember seeing that league.
 
In college basketball, its the "Power 6". Big East is elite and commands as may bids as anyone.

Beyond the P6, I think the WCC should get 2 or 3 this year, AAC should get 2 or 3, MWC has a chance at 2, and the A-10 could get to 2 even though this is about as down as I can remember seeing that league.

I misspoke-The American and Big East are major/multi-bid leagues. As far as the WCC, Gonzaga and St. Marys are obvious, with BYU and San Diego having chances to build their resumes up. The A-10 is very down, and I think the easiest way to a second bid for them is somebody other than Rhode Island winning that tournament. St Bonaventure is the only one with any sort of at large case IMO-but they have a couple ugly losses (St. Joe's and Niagara at home) and one real shot at a huge boost when Rhode Island goes there next month. In terms of the MWC...........agree.
 
I misspoke-The American and Big East are major/multi-bid leagues. As far as the WCC, Gonzaga and St. Marys are obvious, with BYU and San Diego having chances to build their resumes up. The A-10 is very down, and I think the easiest way to a second bid for them is somebody other than Rhode Island winning that tournament. St Bonaventure is the only one with any sort of at large case IMO-but they have a couple ugly losses (St. Joe's and Niagara at home) and one real shot at a huge boost when Rhode Island goes there next month. In terms of the MWC...........agree.
MWC is like the A-10. They need Boise State to keep winning and to upset New Mexico in the conference tourney. Or a name program like SDSU or UNLV to catch lightening in a bottle the rest of the way to be a multi-bid league. A-10 has Rhode Island in the UNM position, but could get that 2nd bid if the Bonnies or Duquesne dominate and then pull an upset in the conference tourney or if VCU catches lightening in a bottle the rest of the way.
 
MWC is like the A-10. They need Boise State to keep winning and to upset New Mexico in the conference tourney. Or a name program like SDSU or UNLV to catch lightening in a bottle the rest of the way to be a multi-bid league. A-10 has Rhode Island in the UNM position, but could get that 2nd bid if the Bonnies or Duquesne dominate and then pull an upset in the conference tourney or if VCU catches lightening in a bottle the rest of the way.

I agree with you on URI-they're in really good shape. The only other team in the A-10 who is in the at large discussion right now are the Bonnies IMO.
 
I agree with you on URI-they're in really good shape. The only other team in the A-10 who is in the at large discussion right now are the Bonnies IMO.
Right now, I'd agree. I was talking about how much could change with over 1/3 of the season left, though. Programs like Dayton and VCU are respected enough that pretty much running the table the rest of the way would cause folks to take note. Duquesne has a pretty great record that could get them in the conversation despite not having any quality wins in the OOC (they probably need to win the A-10 tourney and have the team they upset get an at-large).
 
great, very young team. lots of fun, tremendous future. but, it would be miraculous if they didn't stumble once or twice in the homestretch. win the nit
 
The OP has been updated.

Buffs are now #53 RPI with some very quality wins.

This week is huge.

To start, obviously 13-7 (5-3) looks a hell of a lot easier on the eyes than 11-7 (3-3) if we're talking about the tourney bubble.

And winning 2 games against solid competition (Washington State & Washington) would bump the RPI a bit even though these are home games.

But inside the numbers with this new way of breaking down the team sheets, the Buffs have looked weak in Columns 2 & 3. Assuming the rest of the teams we've played hold to the same Columns they were in for this week, sweeping this homestand would even CU's record in Column 2 and Column 3 games -- allowing the 3-2 record in Column 1 games and no bad losses (undefeated in Column 4) to shine through more brightly.
 
Last edited:
Mercer needed OT to beat frikin Chattanooga in a home game tonight. Now 8-9 (1-3). Their season hurts our resume so much when the expectation was that they'd win about 20 and probably represent the Southern League in the NCAA Tourney.

Still, they came in at RPI 220. If they can get that into the top 200 by figuring things out and winning conference games (very realistic possibility), they would become a Column 3 win for CU. We really need that for the resume.
 
New Mexico won at UNV tonight. That jumped them from #206 to #168. Tier 3 for home games is the Top 160, so that's a huge move onto the cusp of being a more quality win for CU's resume. (y)(y)
 
Stanford winning by double digits vs ASU with under 8 minutes left.

ASU getting b.s. calls from the refs again where they jump in front of offensive players and then flop on contact (aka, the "Duke Special"). Two absolute horse**** charges called in the past few minutes against Furd that has even their fans pissed off and fairly loud.
 
Back
Top