What's new
  • Prime Time. Prime Time. It's a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars, and best of all, no ads! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
  • After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936

Official CU Resume & Bubble Watch 2021-22

When are NET rankings updated to include today‘s win?

Any chance we climb into contention as of now? Or, would winning against zona tomorrow be enough?
or is our only path to win the Pac12 tourney?
 
When are NET rankings updated to include today‘s win?

Any chance we climb into contention as of now? Or, would winning against zona tomorrow be enough?
or is our only path to win the Pac12 tourney?
Around 8am ET.

Something I much preferred about RPI was the transparency of the math with real time updates.
 
My post from a month ago. Hoping:

"there is no way to quantify how much different teams have been hurt by covid: from individual players missing games to schedule disruptions. The NCAA will have and, I hope use, more discretion than any season before. My hope is they over-emphasize the last month/tournaments. Go Buffs!"
 
Re: East Coast Bias

Maybe the Pac 12 should just bite the bullet and play games at 5/6pm Pacific/Mountain time?

As someone living on Eastern time (as does ~50% of the US population) there's just no staying up for a game that tips at 10 or 11 pm, when you have to be a functioning adult the next morning.
 
Re: East Coast Bias

Maybe the Pac 12 should just bite the bullet and play games at 5/6pm Pacific/Mountain time?

As someone living on Eastern time (as does ~50% of the US population) there's just no staying up for a game that tips at 10 or 11 pm, when you have to be a functioning adult the next morning.
They actually did more early starts this year. But it doesn't matter. It's not start time, it's the garbage Pac12 Network.
 
The fact the ESPN is still forcing Michigan into Bracketology and not even as a 12 seed qualifier just shows you how much bias there is. Other teams that are VERY questionable yet still getting too much love:
- Iowa State
- Miami
- Memphis
- San Fran
 
My post from a month ago. Hoping:

"there is no way to quantify how much different teams have been hurt by covid: from individual players missing games to schedule disruptions. The NCAA will have and, I hope use, more discretion than any season before. My hope is they over-emphasize the last month/tournaments. Go Buffs!"
I think I replied to you a month ago,
1. that part of the change w/ NET rankings is to NOT place additional emphasis on late season games.
2. that there are ways to quantify how much teams have been hurt by Covid. you actually list two different ways of quantifying that.

but #2 isn't relevant to the selection process.

I know where you're coming from, but I don't think the committee should try to estimate Covid impact as part of the "who's in, who's out" decisions. I feel this way because (1) illness never has been a factor in this before, and I haven't heard a case made that Covid should be treated differently (2) the impact of Covid on any given team is/was something that teams themselves have/had a lot of control and influence over; I don't think any teams should get a break because their players and staff didn't follow protocols.
 
I think I replied to you a month ago,
1. that part of the change w/ NET rankings is to NOT place additional emphasis on late season games.
2. that there are ways to quantify how much teams have been hurt by Covid. you actually list two different ways of quantifying that.

but #2 isn't relevant to the selection process.

I know where you're coming from, but I don't think the committee should try to estimate Covid impact as part of the "who's in, who's out" decisions. I feel this way because (1) illness never has been a factor in this before, and I haven't heard a case made that Covid should be treated differently (2) the impact of Covid on any given team is/was something that teams themselves have/had a lot of control and influence over; I don't think any teams should get a break because their players and staff didn't follow protocols.
You are probably right. As much as anything., I'm hoping. Human nature could get some of these people thinking the 1st half of the season was "tainted". With Covid, there are dozens of ways teams were affected, and I don't think you can really tell who suffered, how much.
 
Back
Top