The quote was "next week at the earliest"
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
DC Search Including & beyond the 1st 4 Candidates
- Thread starter boydbuff
- Start date
- Status
The quote was "next week at the earliest"
I like SD's version better.
Oops. Worse than I remembered
Lt.Col.FrankSlade
Well-Known Member
I have to respectfully disagree with several points.
First - when your 1st (and if I understand correctly 2nd) choice turns you down - the amount of time is absolutely because of lack of interest in the job. If the 1st (and 2nd) choices were interested the job would be filled.
No doubt MacIntyre and George are working hard to find a decent 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. choice.
Second - the idea that Baer and MacIntyre were "butting heads" is absolutely ridiculous to me. Baer has been MacIntyre's defensive coordinator the entire time he has been a head coach. And suddenly in 2014 they are butting heads about defensive philosophy?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which is weird, right?
OK. If the take is the reason its taking long is to identify and vet candidates b/c Gibbs chose Tech, then I'd agree. If the take is no one wants this job, it's toxic, coaching tree, etc. then I disagree.
On butting heads -- I mentioned it more than once during the season and after the season before Baer "moved on." Not some convenient spin. MacIntyre was not happy with the defense and the lack of turnovers. They did not agree on how to fix it.
On butting heads -- I mentioned it more than once during the season and after the season before Baer "moved on." Not some convenient spin. MacIntyre was not happy with the defense and the lack of turnovers. They did not agree on how to fix it.
Last edited:
How about this for the Second?
Mac "What we're doing isn't working in the Pac-12. We need to make some changes."
Baer "We need to stay the course." - or - "I agree, but believe in a different direction for the changes."
It seems very reasonable to me that this would happen. It's not like they share a brain or that the defense didn't fail in the very areas that were emphasized.
Deleted member 807
Guest
In the movie "The Birdcage" Nathan Lane's character leans towards hysteronics and hyperbole. You posts are 100% more entertaining when read with that voice.
http://youtu.be/TmO1R-GqD50
LaRussa said he and Baer were not fired...they left for their own reasons...friendships mostly is my understanding.
I think you are not speaking accurately about what LaRussa said - LaRussa didn't say anything about Baer.
Now that I think about it, I think you're right. He was only talking about himself.
That's how I hear most posts here. Maybe it's me projecting, though.
LaRussa is married to Bernardi's daughter. FWIW
Maybe it has been mentioned elsewhere, but anyone think the lack of a DC could lead to more defections from the Defensive recruits for 2015? Obviously those who were recruited primarily by Baer and Larussa are at risk probably more than the others. Could be anyone worried we change our defensive philosophy in a way that adversely effects their likelihood of playing.
Regardless, like everyone else here I hope we resolve this soon!
Regardless, like everyone else here I hope we resolve this soon!
I'd welcome the opportunity to re-recruit these kids when the new DC is in place. More than 1 wouldn't be offered I'd surmise.
Last edited:
BlackNGold
Club Member
I know what was going on but Baer was not all of a sudden different. Baer likes to pretty much stay in a base package and keep everything in front of the defense - I said this the day he was hired. He is very easy to gameplan against because he does not give you many different looks or disguise the defense very well. Blitz are few and far between. He was doing that at ND over a decade ago. You did see a few more blitzes later in the season and maybe that was MacIntyre. One thing in defense of Baer is he did not have the players to take a lot of risk - would of given up more big plays if he did it too much. I think MacIntyre just realized late what others realized a long time ago.
**** happens. MM wanted to change some things and they no longer agreed. Seems not that far-fetched to me.
BlackNGold
Club Member
thanks. Could be spin, but he said what he said.
No, it was a "conscious uncoupling" according to Gwyneth.
BuffaloSoldier76
Unsound Meat
I think it is sweet that you think we're going to have a new DC on board before signing day. Even if they hired someone this week (which it doesn't sound like they plan to) they'd only have a week to try to re-recruit guys.
The pooch has been royally screwed in this whole DC changeover. Makes an already weak program look even weaker that we can't even dupe anybody into taking a job with us at this point. It will be a major problem if they don't have someone in place by NLOI Day. The way this is going right now, I'm guess we're going to end spring practices without a DC on staff.
Opinion police has arrived!
BlackNGold
Club Member
I am pretty sure that Baer was pushed. He had a $200K buyout in his contract and I am sure he would not of left unless the buyout was waived. I suspect that he was told things were not working out so go look for a job. Not sure if MacIntyre would of fired him though if he chose to stay.
- Status